Levels Of Analysis And The Stu Essay -- essays research papers

Three takes of psycho outline, each with its own distinct strength, reveals leash different ship idleral of understanding international dealing. The archetypical takes that all nation-states behave similarly, the second emphasizes the eccentric internal factors of a nation-state, while the third direct of abbreviation focuses on the individual deciding a state&8217s course of execute. from each one take of analysis is multipurpose in the study of international relations. Indeed, use all together, it is non long before arriving at a stoppage where a vast number of explanations for the actions of a country are brought to light. However, to stovepipe understand international relations, one level of analysis is more useful than the rest, because it provides the most comprehensive investigation into the conditions which mould a nation&8217s actions. This, most involved level, is the third level of analysis it takes into account the not simply the individual who ultimate ly makes the decision, but the individuals who influence the decision- qualification individual, as wellspring as what might influence those who exert their influence. Because the third level of analysis is so in-depth, it plunder discover the deeper reasons behind an action taken by a nation, even possibly finding fault in a conclusion made by the first or second level of analysis. More so, what makes this level the take up means to understand international relations is that because the third level of analysis considers what influences might effect the decision-making individual, and therefore it can be seen upon a closer examination that the inferences found in first and second levels of analysis can furthermore be found inwardly the third level of analysis. So then, the third level of analysis is the best level at which to approach the study of international relations.As antecedently stated, the third level of analysis encompasses all the possible influences upon the decision making individual. Unlike level one and level two, the third level of analysis can go beyond the assumption of a monolithic state. In addition, it can do so without losing the ability to consider the state as such. Depending on the model used, the level three analysis can all probe into a deeper dimension to seek out the reasons for a state&8217s behavior by looking at different groups that influence the decision maker (as in the organi... ...lusions about how and why a county may react yet, to fully understand what drives these actions it is necessary to take a level three approach. It probes into the depths of the decision making process and exposes the limitless possibilities created by influences and perceptions. And it does this without losing its condenser for a simple approach thus, giving it a distinct payoff over the other two levels of analysis. Using the chess game analogy, it can focus on each of the individual pieces used in the game, or simply the person playing it. In addition, another advantage of the level three analysis is that it encompasses all the basic elements of the first and second levels because of its cleverness to examine the perceptions of the individual originating from their individual applications of the first and second levels of analysis. The level three analysis cuts to the core of the decision making process, and afterall, countries take the course of action that their leaders decide. It is only at this level that a full and all comprehensive understanding can be reached and therefore, the third level of analysis is the best approach to the study of international relations.