Sunday, January 12, 2014

Analysis on Maya Angelou's 'Caged Bird'

How has the poet conveyed the idea of inequality in her poem ?Caged Bird?? How has she do this equalize vivid for the reader?The poet, during the whole poem contrasts heller very assorted realities; the caged red cent?s and the isolated dame?s. By alternating the stanzas in the poem, she makes it easier for the reader to compare both(prenominal) fizzles. The snorts throughout the poem are actually an ext peculiarityed fiction to the conditions of men, approximately shrive, rough ?caged?. When describing the lighten snicker, she wonts vocalizes like ?leaps? and ?floats?. By use the phrase ?leaps on the back of the wind? she makes an allusion to the children?s lame ?leap frog?, by making allusion to this game, the actor compares the free fowl with a child, with no duties and no involvement to be stuck to. The word ?floats?, when employ in describing the way the free razz flies shows that the bird is just there, flying with no duties and preoccupations. He is just flying. In contrast to leaping and floating, the caged bird is express to ?stalk?. This word gives a very different topic to the actions of the caged bird, in comparison to the free bird?s. As he ?s duologue down his narrow cage? he cannot do the very(prenominal) as the free bird. He is stuck to the ground and has no license at all. The free bird is said to float ?in the orangish sun?s rays?. This sentence brings up an image to the readers take aim of a cozy, warm day, with the sun shining peacefully upon some hills and also the bird flying, floating amongst the clouds. When talking active the bird, the poet uses an impactful phrase, she says the caged bird can ?seldom see through his forbid of fancy? and this means the bird rarely sees more than the parallel disallow of his cage. This brings to the reader an image of a l geniusly bird, chanting in the dark corner of a dark room. By victimization the expression ?bars of storm? the poet can mean deuce things. Fi rst, the bars could contain or be made of ra! ge, which doesn?t let the bird be free. other way the ? rid of of rage? can be interpreted is, possibly, as the birds rage; the bars are maybe imaginary and what imprisons him is his own rage. other comparison the poet makes is the caged bird has his ?wings clipped and his feet tied?. This impost let him fly and won?t let him walk. He is chained to the cage so soon, maybe won?t be free at all. The free bird however, has ? risque worms waiting on a dawn-bright lawn? , he has available aliment wherever and whenever he wishes to. This can be said metaphorically to compare the rich people who can eat whatever they wish at any time at all, with the lower-ranking fortunate people who struggle to find a theatrical performance role of bread. All the comparison the poet makes are to compare the devil different lines of life where on side can be considered free and the other side, caged. The author says: ?his feet are tied so he opens his pharynx to sing?. By using the word ?so?, the impression that is given is that as the bird has energy else to do, he sings. is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
This situation is similar to the African slaves that had their own ? browse songs? to countenance them to keep working, even when suffering. In the poem, songs are used as encouragement, used to give strength to the ?caged? people. Another kindle thing the author says near the free bird is he ?dares to deal the sky?. This is said in the first stanza. In the near stanza the author talks about the free bird, he says ?and he names the sky his own? meaning the free bird wanted something and got it. In contrast, the caged bird is said to ?opens his throat to sing? and then ?sings o! f freedom? therefore, he is still locked up. When the poet talks about the free bird, the stanzas are very different, each one boastful continuity to the previous one, this is not the same with the caged bird?s stanzas. They are very repetitive; stanzas 2 and 5 end with ?so he opens his throat to sing? and stanzas 3 and 6 are exactly the same. These repetitions of phrases and stanzas are made to try the contrast between the two birds and the lack of action in the caged bird?s reality. The caged bird continues in the same situation he started, even though what he wanted was ofttimes less(prenominal) than the free bird wanted. Source: IGCSE poetry anthology 2008 If you want to take a full essay, order it on our website:

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment