In Paragraph 28, Mill continues to talk about more misapprehensions about utilitarianism, much(prenominal) as considering utilitarianism as a godless doctrine because the moral foundation of utilitarianism is the human happiness instead of the will of God. Mill replies that if God desires the happiness of all His creatures, then utilitarianism should be the almost religious of any other doctrine. He states in pg 345, ...
I answer, that a utilitarian who believes in the perfect goodness and intuition of God, necessarily believes that whatever God has thought fit to describe on the subject of morals, must fulfill the requirements of utility in a supreme degree. He believes that principles of utilitarianism do not passage of arms with any of Gods revealed truths about morality.
In Paragraph 29, Mill dialog about how utilitarianism is considered immoral, because it is often incorporated with the name of expediency. Mill argues that the word carpetbag generally means acting pervert for the sake of personal interest or short-term goals. Therefore, the rendering of expediency is actually hurtful instead of being useful. wherefore Mill implies that hurting society is not necessarily expedient but...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment