St. Anselm presents the first premise of the Ontological argument as follows, Every being that exists, exists in the understanding or in the reality or both. (Perry, p.78) Based on the foundational beliefs of Rene Descartes, we already know that I think and I exist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5901/f59017c75924e81dd0058d715ed9e9e69236562c" alt="Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!"
Anselm continues to say, I understand God[2], God is the greatest conceivable being[3], if I understand God, then God exists in the understanding[4], so, God exists in the understanding[5](pg.78). These are premises two through five of the Ontological argument. Understanding God is a form of thinking, which is something that is already understood to be true. So, at this point God does exist in the understanding, which supports premise one, proving God is a being. The next set of premises, sextet through twelve, work to prove that God exists in reality through a method known as reductio ad absurdum ad absurdum.
Reductio ad absurdum means to reduce to an absurdity, or meaninglessness. For example, consider this set of premises; Bush...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment