Law Essay

p The Law Process 1 RUNNING interrogative : The Law Process The Law Process in the 12 outraged Men[Name of Author][Name of School][Name of Professor][Course Number] The Law Process in the 12 Angry Men12 angry men is a movie full of surprises powered by the 12 jurywomans who was to examine an eighteen-year old composition whom was accuse for killing his father . These jurors where mainly are on their middle-aged and basically , belongs to the middle class society . They were brought together to plow the case of the young men and to decide whether the incriminate go out be judged guilty or not guilty . The male child s livelihood will dep peculiarity on the last of the 12 jurors if they ll had a unanimous finding of guilty and will be brought into electrical chair as a punishmentThe story circles in the argument whether the boy will be automatically accused guilty without examining the incident . This was so , because they were pretty sure that the man was guilty because of the strong evidences presented by the testimonials of the old woman and the whatsoever other neighborhoodBut juror 8 could not just argue with the remain eleven jurors because for him , it is a life that they were talking in the board room . They might be wasting a life if ever they made a mistake in the decision . He pointed out that they take for granted t know the real fairness so they pull in to cross-examine everything . It became a tragic for the juror 8 to convince the remaining eleven . After having several clear-sighted discussions , though the eleven jurors showed strong argument that the boy must(prenominal) be guilty , little by little , at the end , they had a unanimous decision of not guiltyAt the crack of the boy , we can strongly say that he does , have the justice . There are several testimonies that don t very proved that he was guilty .

Personally , I was not comfortable with the outcome of the mental testing . First , the trial was not made in a due process . If you ll banknote , the whole trial was imprintated . It was mostly composed of opinion of the jurors . But I very admire the courage of the juror 8 to withstand of what he believes was supposed to do . imprimatur , the jurors were just mislead with the argument . All the juror 8 wants was to have a fair trial with the case . He wanted to first hear the whole case forrader bringing one s life into death . But at the end , the trial seems to be a matter of choosing among guilty or not guilty . Maybe some of the jurors were just brought up the situation and pressure , for at the end , they all decide to have a unanimous decision of not guilty After all , they still don t know the truth . On the side of the victim the trial was not fair for having that fast decision . What if they boy really killed his father ? No one knowsThe law...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper