Feminist Interpretations of Intellectual Property

justify why, according to Halbert, quilt and knit are conventionally away(p) the realm of copyright protection. There have been changes in the world of knitting. The long history of sharing patterns among knitters was usurpe in easy to share formats with minimal concerns for copyright issues. But directly a dominance of ownership has been privatized to maximize in profits. two quality and knitting were primary ways of creating and have existed outside copyright law perhaps because the romantic author and the swear for profit were not central to the process of creation. The knitting patterns were change to make money and not to further the culture of knitting. talk over how and why this is changing. The change in the traditional way of quilting and knitting versus the copyright protection is the dominance of ownership. Everything now is universe privatized while maximizing on the profits. A personal signature, individualizing the patterns, allows a financial gain for anyone wanting to copy a pattern. Explain why crafts like these do not fit intimate the copyright paradigm.

These crafts were known for completion amongst women enjoying the company of each other. The crafts dont fit into copyright paradigm because it attempts to solidify connections among people and not divide people by dimension boundaries. Discuss what values underlie authorship in the traditional literary context. The values that underlie authorship in knitting are in the individuals that make changes to the designs, picks, and colors of the yarn and raiment unique motivation into the knitting process. In quilting, the sewn patterns portrays a womens history because it tells a story of the women who made them and patsy changes in the status of women over time. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper